Computers in Cardiology Challenge 2002 Top Scores (Final)
This year's challenge scoring had an unusual twist: scores for event 1 were determined by entries in event 2, and vice versa (see the Challenge overview for details). The outcome of event 2 was determined very quickly. Rather than continuing both events until 20 September as originally announced, we collected event 2 entries until the deadline for official entrants (noon GMT on 30 April) had passed, and then determined final scores for event 1.
If you did not have a chance to submit an official entry, we encourage you to participate anyway; you can still submit classifications of the challenge dataset and receive an unofficial score. Unofficial event 1 entries are also welcome; if there is sufficient interest, we will run a second round of this challenge, using new RR interval generators and a new dataset.
Winners of each event received awards during September's Computers in Cardiology conference, where participants presented their work. The RR interval generators submitted by event 1 participants are available here.
Brief descriptions of the methods used can be viewed by following the links in the tables below to abstracts submitted by many of the entrants for presentation at Computers in Cardiology 2002.
Event 1 (generating RR interval series)
The top scorers in event 1 are:
Place | Entry number | Entrant | Score |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 192 |
DC Lin Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada |
3.452 |
2 | 171 |
Dragan Gamberger, Ivan Maric, Tomislav Smuc, Gordan Bosanac,
Nikola Bogunovic, Goran Krstacic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, Zagreb, Croatia |
1.494 |
3 | 142 |
Albert C-C Yang, Cheng-Hsi Chang, SS Hseu, Huey-Wen Yien Taipei Veterans General Hospital School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan |
0.689 |
4 | 201 |
PE McSharry, GD Clifford Dept Maths & Dept Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK |
0.497 |
5 (tie) | 153 | Manojit Roy University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA |
0.202 |
5 (tie) | 161 | Miguel A. García-González, Juan Ramos-Castro Instrumentation and Bioengineering Division, Electronic Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain | 0.202 |
Event 2 (classification)
Six participants received perfect scores in event 2 before the deadline for official entrants had passed. The winner was Albert C-C Yang, who not only achieved a perfect score on his first attempt, but also submitted the first entry received for event 2, only a few hours after the challenge dataset was posted.
Perfect scores of 100 were received by:
Date | Entrant | Entries |
---|---|---|
25 Apr 1028 GMT |
Albert C-C Yang National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan |
1 |
25 Apr 1505 GMT |
Sang H Yi, Seon H Kim, C Yoo, K Park Inje University, Korea |
2 |
26 Apr 1222 GMT |
FE Smith, Emma Bowers, Philip Langley, John Allen, Alan Murray Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK |
1 |
26 Apr 1818 GMT |
N Wessel University of Potsdam, Germany |
1 |
27 Apr 0952 GMT |
Tomislav Smuc Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb, Croatia |
2 |
28 Apr 1459 GMT |
H Malberg Karlsruhe Research Center, Germany |
1 |
Three other teams of participants, who did not receive perfect scores before the deadline, also used novel automated methods to classify the challenge dataset for their entries in event 2 (follow the links to read the abstracts of the papers describing these methods):
GD Clifford, PE McSharry
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
M Costa, AL Goldberger, CK Peng
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
JC Echeverría, MS Woolfson, JA Crowe, BR Hayes-Gill
University of Nottingham, UK
Links:
- Read about the PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge 2002.
- Although the competition has ended, you may still download the challenge dataset and submit your results for (unofficial) scoring.
- The correct classifications for event 2 are available here. (But wait! Are you sure you don't want to try the challenge first?)
- Read about Computers in Cardiology 2002, which will be held in Memphis, Tennessee, 22-25 September.
- Read about our previous PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenges.
- What should be the topic of next year's challenge? Do you have a data set that can help in creating a challenge? Please send us your ideas!